Discipline makes Daring possible.

Unusual perspectives

Unusual perspectives

Today, I’m recommending Jason Fried’s blog.

As I’m sure you know, Jason wrote “It doesn’t have to be crazy at work“, a book well worth reading if you haven’t already.

Jason writes from the perspective of a business that is ‘big enough’, doesn’t need to be bigger, and is primarily a vehicle for improving the lives of its customers and employees.

Nowadays that’s quite the radical view, and it gives him a very different perspective on all the things businesses do, or are told they should do which is really refreshing and always makes me think.

If you’d like an even more radical perspective on what business could be, I also recommend Ari’s Top 5 by Ari Weinzweig, co-founder of the Zingerman’s Community of Businesses.

And if you’d like to create your own, more rounded perspective on business and it’s place in the world, I recommend the Wolf Tool from Bev Costoya.

Discipline makes Daring possible.

 

This week, I am mostly going to recommend…

This week, I am mostly going to recommend…

Blogs and books to read, people to follow, ideas to think about, actions to take.

My first recommendation this week is a blog “Funding the Future” by Professor Richard Murphy.

One of todays posts is chilling, which is why I am recommending it.

Richard pulls no punches:

“The threat created by climate change is now bigger than that which was created by Covid.

It is bigger than the threat created by the global financial crisis in 2008.

It is also likely that the threat is now at least as big as that created by the Second World War because as many people as then are now at risk from democidal governments.”

 

I don’t always agree with him, but his posts always make me think about how things could be different.

The first step to changing things is to talk about how they are, how they could be, and how we could help them change in a direction that works for all of us.

The more of us that do that, the better, because we need to move fast.

De-cluttering

De-cluttering

“Do you really need 10 cake slices?  Let’s get them down to one or two, shall we?”

One of the first things a professional de-clutterer will do is get rid of ‘duplicates’.

This is a strictly utilitarian view, that says one cake-slice is much like another, and ignores all the possible reasons why you might end up with 10 of them.

You might have received one as a gift, or inherited one from a parent or friend. You might have had to rush out and buy new because you couldn’t put your hand on one just when you needed it. You might have just liked the look of it.

Or you might simply be satisfying that very human urge for repetition with variation that encourages us to build collections.

All that makes choosing ‘the one’ that’s going to stay, emotional and just a bit stressful, especially if you’re made to feel judged by your inability to maintain a minimal lifestyle.

Which might be one reason I dislike de-cluttering TV programmes so much.

As you grow your small business, working out what your clients really want, and finding new ways to delight them, you acquire business processes like I acquire cake-slices.

You inherit them from your previous workplace, or maybe even the previous owner. A new employee gifts you a shiny new one.  You cobble a new one together in a rush, because you can’t quite put your hand on the one you did earlier when you need it.

Or, as happens when we’re in the thick of it, it’s simply easier to focus on the differences between cases rather than the similarities.

Luckily, business processes aren’t like cake slices. We don’t have to choose.

We can combine the best features of all of them to create one beautiful and super-useful process, with all the emotion built in, and still with room enough to deal with a new kind of cake.

That means that when I work with clients, I can start by assuming we’re going to keep everything, and work on capturing and streamlining the most salient version – the one that happens most, or is the most difficult to hand over, or the most complicated.

Usually, by the time we’ve worked through that, the owner has realised that they don’t need all the others. This new process covers all the options.

We check to make sure of course. And if, on further inspection, it turns out we do need another version, we put that in place, reusing as much of the newly designed process as we can.

No stress. No agonising over what to keep and what to throw away. No being made to feel like you are in the wrong.

Just the relief of knowing that all that clutter is now out of your head, and out of the business too.  Making it a calmer, clearer place to work for everyone, with added room for innovation.

Discipline makes Daring possible.

I’m Kirsten Gibbs, Boss Disappearer, and I can help you write your Customer Experience Score , to make your business easier to run, easier to grow and easier to build into a legacy you’ll be proud of.

Ask me how.

Making payment part of the experience

Making payment part of the experience

It’s a cliché that small businesses like me don’t like to ask for payment.   That we somehow feel guilty about asking to be paid for the value we deliver – perhaps because we don’t altogether believe in that value ourselves.

The upshot is that either we invoice late, even erratically, or we seek to make the payment aspect invisible to the client, by using a service like GoCardless for example.

But what if there was a better way?

What if you could make payment truly part of the customer experience?  In the way it often is for retail.

What if you could use every invoice to remind your client of how far they’ve come on the journey they enrolled on with you?  Of how much they’ve achieved as a result of working with you?  Of all the ideas and actions you’ve generated together?

To enable them to relive all the reasons they chose you, and the benefits they’ve gained as a result?

That might be a far from unpleasant experience for the client.

Of course to keep invoicing, you’d have to keep delivering value.

But that’s not a bad discipline to put yourself under.

After all, Discipline makes Daring possible.

 

There is no such thing as Admin

There is no such thing as Admin

If I ruled the world, there would be no such thing as admin.

 

No doing the job, and then recording that you’ve done the job.

No doing the job, then trying to remember how long it took you.

No working out how far you are through doing a job.

No going looking for the things I need to do the job.  They would simply appear when I need them as a result of another job, done by me or someone else.

No raising invoices for a job done, days or even weeks after it was done. Getting paid is an intrinsic part of doing the job.  It can also take place in parallel.

No starting a job without finishing it.  Or at least leaving it in a clearly defined and safe state.

 

There would be reporting.  It just wouldn’t be me doing it.   Doing the job would produce this information as a side-effect.  No need to create extra ‘work about work’ to do that.

There would be feedback too.  From the system to me, that tells me where I am and how I’m doing.   From other humans to me and from me to other humans about how we could make doing the job easier, faster, cheaper, more effective – for the benefit of the people we serve.

 

Let software do all the admin.  Leave the difficult, unpredictable, interesting bits of doing the job to me please.   I’m better at them than any machine.

 

My world is not so hard to achieve.  It’s possible right now.

 

All you have to do is think differently about what a job is.

Ask me how.

 

Discipline makes Daring possible.

Revisiting the past

Revisiting the past

Today seemed like a good day to revisit this blog post, inspired four and a half years ago, by Seth Godin:

“In the last fifty years, thanks to Deming and Crosby and others, we’ve gotten significantly better at creating perfect outputs that don’t rely on heroism and luck. Design a better system, you’ll get better outputs.

I’m grateful every day for the nearly invisible perfect things that I count on… but, and I feel spoiled to say this, I take the perfect for granted.

I’m way more interested, and spend far more time and money on the imperfect things, the things that might not work, the ideas and services and products that dance around the edges.”

I agree. Over time, the perfection of processes has freed ever more of us up to spend ever more time on the interesting, edgy things – telling stories instead of fetching water, making art instead of travelling for days on end, discovering new things instead of cooking, connecting with and trusting strangers instead of only dealing with people we already know.

But I also disagree with Seth’s implication that you can only have one or the other, perfect process or interesting edge, invisible clockwork or flesh and blood.

For me the fascinating challenge is to how to combine both.

How do you put enough process in place to make sure that what should be invisible stays invisible, without restricting the free exploration that discovers new edges?

How do you ensure that clockwork-like perfection supports and enables flesh and blood to dance around the edges, making things more human, more emotional, more daring?

If a process framework is like a musical score, how do you make it more jazz than classical?

I didn’t have a perfect answer, then, and I don’t now, but I am getting closer.

  • It’s about defining a floor (even better, a springboard), ‘the least that should happen’, along with strict guardrails – your Unbreakable Promises, that constrain possible actions to what fits with your Promise of Value.
  • It’s about defining ‘what’, not ‘how’.
  • It’s about maps, not GPS tracking.
  • It’s about embracing uncertainty for its potential upside, while making sure any downside won’t kill you.
  • It’s about automating drudgery, to free humans to be human, and play.

Above all, its about giving human beings the context, the tools and the authority to think for themselves and take the consequences, good as well as bad.

It’s about freedom.  Freedom that recognises every other’s right to the same.

Discipline makes Daring possible

Ask me how.

Harmony

Harmony

Harmony isn’t only everyone singing or playing the same tune at the same time, powerful as that kind of harmony is.

Harmony can also be an active fitting together of differences so that together they sound more than the sum of the parts.

The first kind of harmony is easy to take part in.  Just sing or play along wth everyone else.

The second takes more effort, to hear what’s going on around you, keep time and co-ordinate your own music making accordingly.  An active fitting together of differences to create a much richer sound experience.

You can teach people to make the first kind of harmony just by getting them to practice.

For the second, you need a score.

Which means you have to become a composer, not an instructor.

 

Discipline makes Daring possible

Ask me how.

 

HT to Bettany Hughes for prompting this one.

There’s something about Muri

There’s something about Muri

In Lean, ‘wasted effort’ is categorised 3 ways:

  • ‘Muda’ – effort that does not add value for the customer.
  • ‘Mura’ – wasted effort due to variation.
  • ‘Muri’ – wasted effort due to overburdening or stressing people, equipment or systems.

Muda is the most talked about form of waste, sub-categorised into 7 further types:

  • Transport – excess movement of product.
  • Inventory – stocks of goods and raw materials.
  • Motion – excess movement of machines or people.
  • Waiting.
  • Overproduction.
  • Over-processing.
  • Defects.

Mura is often a result of Muda, and the solution to many of these issues is to standardise processes and relocate resources so they are available ‘just in time’ when and where they are needed.

The problem with this of course, is that whether an activity is Muda depends on where you draw the line around the system.  Biomass boilers are eco-efficient, as long as you don’t count the lorries trucking pellets around a country – a clear case of Transport Muda when you look at the bigger system.

What I want to think about today though, is Muri.  Wasted effort due to overburdening or stressing the people, equipment or system.

There’s something about Muri that makes it the Cinderella of Lean.

It isn’t glamourous, fixing it doesn’t attract the kind of kudos Muda does.  Perhaps it’s just harder to measure.

Whatever the reason it gets left to pick up all the dirty work.

Muri is often caused by too much attention to Muda.  Redundancies are stripped out the system, leaving no room for slack.  Everything is expected to run at 100% capacity all of the time.  People are expected to do more with less, both at work and at home.

The result?

Look around you and what I think you’ll see everywhere a massive case of Muri.  People and systems – including our planetary system – stressed and overburdened to breaking point.

As a small business owner, you can’t fix it all.  But you can fix it in your business.

What if you let people work a 4-day week? or a 13-day fortnight? Or take a 2 hour lunch break?

What if you put together a flexible plan of working hours for the year that accounted for busy times and quiet times?

What if you set the example yourself by working only your official hours, having your weekend and taking a couple of weeks off every now and then?

You could do all of this, even in a service business, by paying a little attention to Muda and Muri (but not too much):

Start by writing down your Customer Experience Score , so that everyone can play it consistently.

  • Automate the parts that are drudgery for humans.
  • Leave room for variations that will delight the customer.
  • Then give people the responsibility and autonomy to get on with it, at a sensible level of capacity.

You’ll all work less hard for greater rewards.

Discipline makes Daring possible.

Ask me how.

Hiding in plain sight

Hiding in plain sight

Orange Oakleaf Butterflies confuse their predators on purpose, hiding in plain sight.

In the dry season, they pretend to be a dried out dead leaf.  In the rainy season they pretend to be a damp dead leaf.  The birds, ants, spiders and wasps that eat them, already have a mental model of what a dead leaf is.   That model doesn’t include being edible.  So they ignore this leaf and carry on looking for their next meal.

 

We humans are the apex predator par-excellence.   We don’t have to pretend to be anything other than we are to survive.

Still, we confuse other people all the time.   Sometimes on purpose, most often by accident.   Because we constantly assume that our mental models are the same as everyone else’s.  We think everyone knows what we know, believes what we believe and wants what we want.

 

Take a small business:

For a shareholder or investor it’s a machine for generating dividends on their capital.

For founders it’s a way to make their unique dent in the universe.

For their accountant it’s a set of connected accounts that need to balance.

For their operations manager it’s a set of loosely related functions, one of which they probably consider to be more important than the others.

For some employees it’s simply a means to enjoy life outside work. For others it’s means to survive. For others still, play.

For customers it’s a solution to a problem, a status enhancer, a community they value or a purpose they believe in.

All these different mental models can pull a business in different directions, leading to confusion.

And as we know, a confused mind says ‘no’.

 

The answer is to get clear about what your business is here to do as soon as you can, and to present that as an explicit model everywhere.

Choose a model that is simple, easy to communicate and effective in delivering what everyone wants.

Design your business around that model, so that the way it works clearly reflects the concept behind it.

Share that model in your marketing materials, shareholder reports, filed accounts, operations manual, help guides and status reports, so that it becomes utterly familiar, whatever your role or relationship to the business.

 

That way, nobody’s confused.

Some may not like it, but they will leave you alone.   The ones that do like it will be more than happy to help you bring it to life.

 

If you’re a small business employer, looking for a model to adopt, you’ll be pleased to know that you already have one, hiding in plain sight.

And I can help you reveal it.

Discipline makes Daring possible.

Ask me how.

Bake the profit in

Bake the profit in

I loved this reminder from @Jason Fried this morning, that your main ‘competitor’ is your own profitability.

And that put me in mind of the kind of tragedy I see played out over and over again with amazing small businesses.   Tragedy that could be avoided with the right kind of attention to detail at the beginning.

As Fried says, as long as you are profitable, you are winning.

For me, the best way to be sure you are profitable, is to know that every single thing you sell is profitable in it’s own right, every time you sell it.

And I mean truly profitable, net profitable, after all costs have been accounted for.

Here’s how to work that out:

Let’s say I make beautiful sourdough bread, 20 loaves a day for 20 lucky subscribers who pick up daily.

First there’s the obvious costs of ingredients:

I buy these in different quantities, so I split each quantity into the number of loaves I will get from it:

  • 10kg of heritage wholewheat flour at £27 (including postage) gives me 20 loaves at a cost of £1.35 per loaf
  • 25kg of sea salt  at £20.95 will season 1923 loaves, at a cost of 1p per loaf
  • 10l of water at 14p per litre, will make 20 loaves at 7p per loaf.

I use 100g of sourdough starter for each loaf, made up of 50g rye flour and 50ml water.

  • 25kg of rye flour at £34 (including postage) will start 500 loaves at 6.8p per loaf.
  • A litre of water at 14p will start my 20 loaves at 0.7p per loaf.

So far then, the ingredients for my sourdough loaf cost me 1.35+ 0.01 + 0.068 + 0.077  = £1.51

But I haven’t allocated all my costs yet:

  • Wastewater – for every litre I use baking, I use about 900ml in washing up.  At 90p per litre this means 81p in total, or 4p per loaf.
  • There’s a fixed charge for water and wastewater of 6p and 18p per day respectively, so 24p per day, or 1.2p per loaf.
  • Obviously I cook my loaves, so there will be fuel costs.  I use an electric fan oven, and cook my bread for an hour, so that comes to about 45p per batch of 4 loaves, or 12p per loaf.

That takes us up to 1.51 + 0.04 + 0.012 + 12 = £1.69 per loaf.

And I still haven’t allocated all my costs:

I bake my loaves on trays lined with parchment paper, 2 loaves per tray

  • 10m of parchment paper at £1.45 will do 28 trays, or 56 loaves, so comes to 3p per loaf.
  • My 2 aluminium baking trays cost me  £13.50 each, and will last me at least 5 years. At 200 baking days a year, with 20 loaves per day, that comes to 20,000 loaves, or 0.135p per loaf.
  • The 8 bannetons I prove my bread in cost me £11.39 each and likewise should last me 5 years.  That adds about 0.5p per loaf.
  • I mix my dough in a couple of 12l stainless steel bowls, at £21.99 each.  That adds another 0.22p per loaf.
  • My dough scraper cost £1.20 and should last me 2 years, which adds 0.15p per loaf.
  • I invested in 2 heat-resistant oven gloves with fingers at £13.99 each. That adds another 0.014p per loaf.

These are tiny amounts, but together, add another 4.2p per loaf.

We’re now up to £1.73 per loaf.

And I still have to add costs for maintaining my sourdough starter (feeding it, keeping it somewhere where it can grow); cleaning up (washing up liquid, wipes etc.); wrapping the loaves (paper or paper bags); selling the loaves (point of sale system subscription or commission, website, marketing (even something as simple as an A board costs money, uses chalks and wears out); heating and/or lighting my kitchen; wear and tear on my worksurfaces etc., etc.

Let’s say that adds another 5p per loaf.

And finally my time.  Which I work out by looking at how much I would have to pay someone else to do it – this is pretty much the minimum wage at the moment, so I decide to pay myself the same for now £10.18 per hour. My 20 loaves a day takes a total of 4 hours to make, bake, and wrap. So that’s £2.04 a loaf.

So now we’re up to £3.82 per loaf.

I do this in my own kitchen at the moment, so there’s no rent. But it’s worth pretending that there is rent to pay right from the off. So I look up how much it would cost to hire a dark kitchen. I can find a 170 sq ft one on Bermondsey for £2,600 per month ex VAT. My own kitchen is half that size, so I halve that figure. I only use it for half a day too, so I halve that again, to get a notional rent of £650 per month.

Divided among my 430 loaves a month, that adds £1.51 per loaf.

So my final total cost per loaf is £5.33

Now I need to add a profit to that.

I know I’ve covered all my costs per loaf, so I can experiment with this, to see what my market will bear.

Whether it’s 30p or 70p or £1.70 per loaf, what matters is that I know it’s all profit.

And that profit margin will only increase as I increase production, buy in more bulk, and spread my fixed costs across more loaves – until I have to rent a bigger kitchen, when it would pay to go through this exercise again.

Doing this exercise in such excruciateing detail is undoubtedly a faff.

But it pays off.

Because by the end of it you have a complete and intimate understanding of what it actually costs you to make the thing you make (whether that’s a product or a service), and that means you can charge the right profitable price for it from the very beginning.

If you don’t – and I’ve seen too many small businesses do this – growth turns into tragedy, because all you’re doing is losing money faster.  Chasing sales, when what matters is profit.

Bake profit into each and every item you sell and you can relax, knowing that your profitability gets better as you grow.

That way you can be sure of being around to keep the promises you make to the people you seek to serve for as long as they want you.

Discipline makes Daring possible.