Discipline makes Daring possible.

Resource-management

Resource-management

We’re used to dashboards, to keeping an eye on resource-levels as indicators of the overall health of a system.

We’re less used to understanding or tracking the processes that update those levels.

If we did, we could probably fix things more quickly when they go wrong.

If we made those processes self-managing (as they often are in modern cars), not necessarily automated, we might even prevent things going wrong in the first place.  After all, humans are sensitive instruments.

Process

Process

People are ambivalent about ‘process’.

For some it feels like a way to ensure consistency, a helpful prop to support them in what they have to do.

For others, its a straitjacket, that turns people into robots.

I prefer to think of it as a springboard.  Something with enough give to be able to support different people, and enough resistance to help them really take off.

Significance

Significance

A worker honey bee will make just over 0.4 grams of honey over its lifetime.

That seems an almost insignificant contribution – about a twelfth of a teaspoon.

But as one of a hive of 30,000 bees, it mounts up.

If you’re trying to make change happen, recruit the others.

Black and White

Black and White

We humans like things to be clear-cut, black-and-white, yes-or-no, all-or-nothing.

Perhaps because that appears to make choosing a solution both easier and somehow more heroic.

Reality is rarely that simple, and if we treat it that way, we are likely to end up creating a lot more work for oursleves.

 

The best protection is permeable

The best protection is permeable

As every Chelsea gardener knows, the best way to protect your garden from wind is not a solid wall or fence, but a permeable barrier like a hedge.

This filters the wind, slowing it down, letting in fresh air to circulate among your precious plants and shrubs without damaging them.

A solid barrier on the other hand lets air crash over it like a wave – and then falls at the first gale.

Comfort

Comfort

“Most of us like things to stay the same, we seek order and predictability.” Except that’s not really true is … Read More “Comfort”

Not freedom or order, but freedom and order.

Not freedom or order, but freedom and order.

This is the second post inspired by an extract from ‘Leadership and The New Science’ by Margaret Wheatley, entitled “Change, Stability, and Renewal: The Paradoxes of Self-Organising Systems

To recap: if a business has a strong frame of reference in place – its Promise of Value and its ‘way we do things round here’ – then it can be confident that any changes that occur will be consistent with that frame of reference.

This means that not only a business can afford to be open to small variations (what Holacracy calls ‘tensions’), it needs to be – especially to small, persistent variations that are driven by the people it serves – its customers.

This in turn means that it makes sense to give people full autonomy to respond to variation, because you know they will do so in line with the Promise of Value at the core of the business, so no harm will be done, and because what starts as a small variation may well turn into a new opportunity, a new product or service, a new way of doing things, that makes the business stronger and more stable over time.

Most of us like things to stay the same, we seek order and predictability.   We fear that loosening control will lead to too much fluctuation and eventually chaos, so we tend to keep systems rigid and control centralised.

The paradox is that the opposite is what we need to maintain the identity and stability of our business over the long term.

Not freedom or order, but freedom and order.

Discipline makes daring possible.

 

Autopoiesis. How self-organising systems evolve.

Autopoiesis. How self-organising systems evolve.

Last weekend I spent a day going through my old London Business School notes before throwing them out to make room.   Its 21 years since I did my Sloan Fellowship, so this stuff is bound to be out of date.

Still, I skim-read quite a bit of it – lecture notes, my coursework, case studies – along the way, and I was struck by how much of it still resonated, especially an extract from ‘Leadership and The New Science’ by Margaret Wheatley, entitled “Change, Stability, and Renewal: The Paradoxes of Self-Organising Systems

According to Ms Wheatley, that’s not at all surprising.   One of the characteristics of a self-organising system (e.g. a human being) is that “as it changes, it does so by referring to itself [autopoietically]; whatever future form it takes will be consistent with its already established identity”,  “when the environment demands a new response, there is a reference point for change.”

For a business that reference point is it’s Promise of Value.   The more clearly and explicitly that is spelt out, and built into the way a business works, the more resilient that business will be – not because it won’t change, but because changes will always be adopted in a way that is consistent with that Promise.

As long as the system is self-organising, that is.    More on that tomorrow.

 

Accumulations

Accumulations

The driving force of capitalism is, unsurprisingly, the accumulation of capital.

Other things are accumulated along the way – some good (knowledge, skills, lives enhanced), some bad (waste, pollution, obesity, lives diminished, extinctions).

We’ve got really good at measuring the capital pile, but as individual businesses, we rarely look at the others.   As a result we underestimate our impact on the world.

Time to account for more than profit.

 

 

 

 

Processes, procedures, workflows

Processes, procedures, workflows

The terms ‘workflow’, ‘procedure”, ‘process’ are often used interchangeably.   I think it’s useful to distinguish between them, because they are doing different things.

A workflow does what it says – it describes how responsibility for an activity flows around your organisation as if it was a physical thing moving between departments – a purchase order is raised, goes to X to be reviewed, then to Y to be authorised, then to department Z to be actioned.

A procedure describes the steps needed to complete a specific activity, e.g. Raise Purchase Order, in the same way as a recipe describes how to prepare a specific dish e.g. a Lemon Drizzle Cake.   Like a recipe, it assumes you know how to do the steps – whisking an egg-white, or completing a purchase order form.

Processes are like the storylines of a film or novel.   As in a film, or novel, each character has their own storyline, and is changed by it.   And like a film or a novel, its best to start from the top and work down – to the point where you can define individual scenes or procedures.     Unlike a film or novel, an organisation has many individuals playing the same roles, both over time and in parallel, so needs to leave some room for improvisation.

Its relatively straightforward to capture a procedure, or even a workflow, its much harder to capture process.   But that’s where the real value is for an organisation, because to live the story, everyone needs to understand the story.